Defamation The Geoffery Rush Case


Tuesday, December 1, 2020

For more information on Defamation visit our website here.

Our practice is located outside of the Perth CBD and because of this our hourly rates and fixed prices for commercial work and for litigation are 20% lower than the standard rates charged by most Perth law firms.  Our rates are extremely competitive compared to the rates charged by other commercial law firms. 

People may find it hard to understand how the defence of the truth was thrown out in the Federal Court recently as a result of argument by lawyers that News Corp could not plead the truth of the allegations against Geoffery Rush as a defence to his claim of defamation.

The decision does not mean that the truth cannot be pleaded as a defence, what it does highlight is the fact that a party relying upon truth must have the evidence of the truth of the allegations in its possession when forming the belief that it is entitled to make the comments that later on are argued to be defamatory and at least at the time of filing their defence.

In this case they did not have that evidence but were relying upon supposition in relation to the existence of an apparent report in the possession of a third party that might have proven the allegations were true.  The point the Judge made was that they didn’t have the report when they published their article about Geoffery Rush nor when they filed their defence and could not therefore rely upon that report as evidence supporting their plead of truth or justification for the matters raised in the newspaper article.

Disclaimer: This newsletter and any information contained herein are intended for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. For any legal advice please contact us at

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation

Back to News